Blog

Lower Quadrant Framing Photography Compositional Technique

Introduction

For me, one of the most impressive uses of this technique in recent times is from a TV series. The beautifully crafted cinematography in Mr Robot shines a cut above most of what I see on TV and continually uses this technique to create and relieve tension between characters whilst building the story. One of the reasons I perhaps find it so effective is I find it easy to identify with which gives it a more powerful voice. Cinematographer Tod Campbell uses lower quadrant framing to create beautiful results that tell the story, shot to shot. Visual tension builds from the very first scene and continues to do so as we learn about Elliot. As my English teacher always told me: ‘show, don’t tell’ and that is exactly what this character study does. The series portrays the protagonists’ boldness, isolation, and loneliness perfectly, as he slowly identifies societies problem with greed and material posessions. This is in part to this technique of placing the characters in carefully thought out places within the frame in each and every scene we come to see them in. Everything about each scene is contructed beautifully, from the acting, sets, lighting and colour toning, to the composition and angles we observe the characters from.

Distracted by Television - 50mm f/1.4D

Not every picture needs to be a masterpiece. Some are merely a record of the scene. This was taken back in 2017 when I was first testing out this technique; admittedly probably never properly understanding it until more recent times. In this scene, the use of the technique in question explains that my son was completly lost watching a cartoon on the TV. He was almost completely unaware of my presence. There is a loss of balance in the frame, and a gaze that is opposite to the usual, expected convention of gazing into the negative space I created on the left of the picture.

Notice the soft, spherical aberration of the lens used wide open at f/1.4 which adds to the dreaminess of the scene and gives it a subtle glow look. I’ve spoken before about how I prefer lenses that produce this effect for portraiture, with the ability to reduce it by stopping down a stop or so. Read more on this here.

Rule of Thirds

Rule of Thirds

The Bride - Notice the two main subjects closely follow the rule of thirds, but not perfectly - 50mm f/1.4G

One of the most conventionally used techniques to frame shots, both cinematically, in artworks and paintings and also for photography; is the rule of thirds. The frame is divided up into nine pieces via intersecting lines. The subject is placed on one of the third intersection points - 1/3 or 2/3 of the way up or across the frame. This technique is simple in itself to use and it is seen absolutely everywhere. It is a good general rule to help with composition and balance, however it can be broken, or used in alternative ways as I have mentioned before. There is no pure magic to simply placing a subject onto a 1/3 intersection however. It’s not a magic compositional trick. As you can see above in my overlay, it is not something you should try to pin exactly on these points. As you may have seen in my Decisive Moment blog post, the frame boundaries and the objects around the edge frames can be important compositional anchors to either further direct the eye, or give the shot important context and we should consider this when framing the shot. You can see that in this particular composition I used a close to a rule of thirds frame, however not quite. I could have moved the camera up to place the lower left girl onto a third. I decided not to. She isn’t the main subject and if I did so, I’d loose some of the beautiful background context above the bride.

Lower Quadrant Framing

Quad framing grid Photography

Quadrant Framing - See below for the full size view

Quad framing, or lower quadrant framing as it is often known; feels like an uneasy version of the rule of thirds; however used creatively, it can have dramatic effect. The frame is split into four pieces this time. The placement of the subject in the lower corners of the frame, and the direction they are facing, along with the context of the background, directly influences the mood created. Quad framing is a play on positive and negative space within the frame. Another way to look at this part of composition over the more simplistic rule of thirds, is the relationship between the subject and the surrounding space. The subject is the “positive space”, while everything surrounding the subject is the “negative space.” If we increase the amount of negative space around a subject, we can increase the scene tension. It can almost feel like we are loosing the subject off the edges of the picture. This can in turn give a sense of oppression. That the subjects are small in the world they occupy and feel that way also. Their visual weight becomes smaller within the context of the frame. In photography and art, we are taught to create negative space and have the subject face gaze into that space - never must we have for example; my son in the picture at the beginning of those post above, be looking right out of frame, with the negative space on the left! However, that is exactly what we can do with this technique, to create an uneasiness, or a certain mood. It can create a disconnect between characters on screen. Or perhaps signify that they stand alone. By doing this, and perhaps even having the subject face in the direction opposite of the negative space in the frame, can construct a feeling of isolation or loneliness. It can also say something awkward about the scene; or that the subject feels under duress. Perhaps the scene does not depict something nice and rosey; that there is some kind of heavy metaphorical weight hanging over the subject. Or in some cases, as I have done below, it says more about the place the subject is present in. It is important to mention, you could apply this to the upper corners in certain scenes and ways, and you have the option of tilting the lens up slightly or down towards the subject to apply further creative effects. All in all, you can see why it is a technique used so often in the incredible Mr Robot TV series, which is ultimately about the crumbling of so called civilised society.

Coffee Shop, Ala Mr Robot - 35mm 1.4 Art

Lens Considerations

For this to work well, you want good control over the background. Because of this, I highly recommend a fast prime, 35mm or longer. Having a fast aperture, f/1.8 or large helps with light gathering and control of the out of focus elements around our subject. When using extreme, off axis compositions it matters even more that the lens chosen has close to zero distortion. You will of course, be able to avoid perspective distortion easily by using a longer lens and not being too close. As mentioned, for full frame, I suggest the shortest focal length for this technique be around 35mm. 28mm may be possible if the lens has a very flat field and you aren't too close to the subject / they aren't human. A flat field 50mm prime works really well to get close. And obviously, portrait lenses like 85’s will be great here too. Get out of thinking that all distortion can be fixed in post. It sometimes just does not play out that way. Why not just select a lens with controlled distortion from the get go? I live with 35mm, 50mm and 85mm primes for this. Next, we want a relatively sharp lens off axis. I am happy as long as the subject isn’t blurry to my eyes on a 4K monitor. I will say that I am fond of the Kubrick picture Barry Lyndon, which uses super fast primes to shoot in candlelight. They aren’t the sharpest lenses on the planet, certainly by modern standards, but look at the candlelit scenes in this film and you will see why I love that look. I go by feel, not numbers or measurements of lenses. If you worry about flare, add that to the list of properties to look for. For me, I love flaring effects, so I actually look for lenses that add characer here. The 50mm f/1.4D Nikkor does this in spades. With the sun behind the subject, it will flare bright red and yellow / green areas if caught at the right angle. Another favourite is the 85mm f/1.4D Nikkor, a classic portrait lens. Not only does it give a beautiful rendering, if flares nicely and provides beautiful bokeh. I also do enjoy using a 35mm f/1.4 as I did in the above picture.

Upper Quadrant framing - 50mm f/1.4D

Upper Quadrant Framing

Often with pictures like the above of my son playing The Forest on my 32” 4K Asus Proart (that I mainly bought for editing, however it works beautifully for 4K 60 FPS gaming); I like to give huge volumes of negative, or background spacing. His head is firmly placed into the top left corner. Almost nothing is in focus here, as the depth of field is so shallow. I can also use the bright central area that f/1.4 glass gives to give a glow to the scene. This is a shot similar to what I described could be done earlier in this article; use the very top of the frame, and either stay level as I have here, or look downward to the subject - filling the remaining negative space effectively. This makes compositional sense here for several reasons; the shot is about him being transfixed to the game. The surroundings are therefore a dominant piece in the picture. Also, if I show more of him, I show less of what he is doing which would make little sense here. I could also have focused on the monitor, however at this aperture, he would have gone completely out of focus and I did not want that. I could have stopped down, however then I could not have shot at ISO 500 and kept all the dynamic range for the screen and shadow areas. Use aperture to your advantage at all times!

The next time you have a prime lens of about 35mm and upwards, spare a thought for lower quadrant framing (or indeed, upper quadrant framing) and see if you can break out of monotonous rule of thirds composition techniques.

Noise Reduction in Photography

Introduction

Noise in images seems to create a huge panic amongst photographers these days, and I honestly do not know why this is. For a long time I have mostly preferred very low levels of noise reduction in images I produce, as I dislike the plasticy look that even advanced AI noise reduction programs achieve, it just does not look natural to my eyes. I have some exceptions to this rule, for example in deep sky astrophotography work where I use a it a little bit more due to the overall process involved; it almost feels more necessary, as it is normal practice to photograph extremely faint deep sky objects and stack many hours of images together to make the final image.

What I seem to see in forums and in discussions, is that this by product of producing a still image is so ugly that it must be removed, and in many cases, totally removed in that we get smudged, lifeless backgrounds of noiseless strata. I think that there are plenty of camera’s out there that produce a very organic, dare I say it, film like grain that doesn’t distract from the image, and at time’s that itself might even enhance it’s “realness” depending on the situation. We should remember most noise is hidden unless coasting 100% views of the image which no one does except us.

Settings

You will notice that in for example, Lightroom, (ie camera RAW in Photoshop) that there are some settings in the noise reduction panel to be aware of. There are sliders for the amount of total global noise reduction, and specific slides for luma noise, and colour noise with sliders to aid their application. For luma noise, I tend to use zero for most work, especially daylight landscapes. Even portraiture, I use very little or any, even if we are speaking about higher ISO portraiture in low light (of course with some directional light too hopefully).

I tend to ensure that colour noise is between 5-35 (this varies image to image); too high a level smudges any singular colour backgrounds together and leaves artefacts which are quite ugly in nature (that plasticy look again). They are very easy to spot in defocused backgrounds with fast lenses. Too low a setting and individual RGB pixels are seen which can really take away from the background of the image.

Pinball Kid

In this example my son is playing his pinball machine and was too warm - deciding to go topless. An unusual, but humorous picture nonetheless, I always have a camera about in the house. This image was processed in Lightroom to reveal the massive dynamic range, and pull out the scene so it looks like what my eyes saw. When first assessing the RAW file, I could see very little into the shadows. The reason the file looks like this as it is presented in a linear looking form and has no curve or contrast adjustments applied to it yet. It was very simple to adjust the curve and shadows to bring out the D810’s beautiful dynamic range. Care must be taken to not just pull sliders about without reason, adding +100 to shadows will really bring out noise in situations like these and will worsen the image globally, reducing contrast and at times giving a horrible muddy, HDR look to the resulting picture. We don’t want that. What we want to do is produce a picture like what our eyes saw. Here are the majority of the settings applied to this RAW file, a relatively simple edit in this case:

The reason I have had to boost by +1.6 on exposure; is because I shot at the dual gain point of the D810’s sensor to maximise it’s dynamic range. The rest of the settings are self explainatory. Notice the slight upward curve point applied at the right of the leftmost hump. This increases midtone contrast and brightness. I have faded off the end of the blacks slightly to soften the image in the deepest tones, indicated by the applied leftmost point. I did a very basic singular mask on his face and highlights of his body and that was it.


Noise Reduction Settings

For this file, I left the settings at my default of 25 for colour NR. any lower, and bright R G B specs could be see in the darkest areas (like the vignette in the corners and the low lying exposure zones). Too high a setting, 35-55 for example, and the green background smudges into a horrible plastic one toned blob. Not a good look. Yes I could clean further with the AI addition in LR, or elsewhere, but I like the grain (it looks bad here bceause it is super magnified).

100% Crop


100% crop. NB focal plane on eyes outwith shot

This is the natural noise “grain” from the sensor, and I like to keep it real. If you have ever printed an image, you would know that noise just doesn’t really show up much. My advice to most shooters is to drop the time wasted on noise reduction and focus on something more worthwhile with the above simple caveats, and consider that yes, for deep sky astro work, things are a little different. Remember, that your mileage may vary. Whilst I feel that cleaning up too much of a file and making it too perfect destroys the realism, especially there are several factors that influence that - for example removing a rock in a landscape etc, you may not. Where does it stop? For every shooter, there will be a different place where they consider the edit has gone too far. As long as you are happy with your result and progess as an editor, you are on the right track.

NB - Please be aware that it is difficult to show you exactly what these files look like here. Image compression applied by the website tech can product some artefacting and blockiness can appear in deep blacks, not present in the end result on my monitor.

The Decisive Moment

Boy and Dog, Nikon D850 with Sigma 35mm 1.4

Composing the Moment

Sometimes, in fact often, making a good picture is about waiting. Life is a waiting game in so many respects. To achieve a picture that is cohesive and produces an emotive response, we need to wait until the scene comes together in order to let it pack it’s fullest punch, so to speak. This is true of most forms of photography, from landscape to portraiture.

The decisive moment is a matter therefore, of timing, vantage point and composition. These three are inextricably linked. The light can work for or against us in these situations where it is most likely something will happen. Let’s examine these three points. Timing is the first obvious one. We don’t want to capture subjects at weird angles, with eyes blinking, squinting faces, odd poses etc. Most people understand this basic conecpt about photography. Vantage point is especially important in most scenes. Sometimes you just need to be a little higher or a little lower to change a good picture into a great one. It’s all about seperation. If I had been lower to the ground here, I would have had the subject interfere with the background radiator, and I wouldn’t gain the lovely seperation we have here. I would have also put too much window into the shot, which would have weakened the shot by pulling the eye out of the scene to a very bright area. Composition is the final, very obvious point. We need to piece the scene together in a logical way that garners the most impact.

For the particular scene above, my son was playing his Nintendo Switch on the TV, and my parent’s little dog, Lottie, was sitting with him as she often did quite content. She was there for quite some time but compositionally, from where I was sitting especially, it did not work as a photograph. I spent a bit of time just watching, no camera, but sitting in the place that would form a nice composition if she moved into the correct place, and he held where we was. I ideally wanted the dog at the corner of the rug, which forms a nice solid arrow towards our subject, Lottie. This along with a placement residing more or less along a third line, balances out the strongly weighted left scene I had in front of me before she moved into that spot. Remember, we have to be flexible here. I can’t put them both perfectly on thirds and just think I am some compositional master. It doesn’t work like that. This is about balance; and I need to show the TV set that my son is looking towards also, in order to give the photograph proper context. I like that they are both looking outward of the frame on the upper left and lower right sides, this actually further balances the overall scene. The lifted paw in slight motion blur, and the slight space between the floor and the paw along with the shadow of the dog on the flooring gives it a dynamic feel. The chair on the right frames the right side, such that the TV does on the left, further balancing the scene that would have still been a little left - heavy without it. It also alludes that this is a living room, of course.

Some compositional basics

The Equipment

If you are using zooms to shoot scenes like these, you are missing out on some goodness. Zooms with f/2.8 apertures are obviously slow compared to fast primes in the f/1.2-1.4 range (x4 less light) and steal opportunities to make a more impactful shot without using flash, which would have absolutely startled and freaked out the little dog. I wouldn’t have been able to achieve the cinematic feel I have here with slow apertures either. I would loose the isolation, the vignette and some of the pop I am getting from this prime lens. You will notice in cinema, that the Director of Photography will pull focus between subjects when they are speaking etc. Often this just causes a subtle blur on the person not talking at the time. We have created this effect here, you can see my son is slightly out of focus, it drives the eye away from his large size in the frame towards the dog. The lens I used here is a Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, teamed up with a Nikon D850, the best DSLR ever built, period. It goes without saying, I would have had no problem shooting this with a D800, or D810 body. In terms of focal length for this scene, 24mm would have been far too wide (subject size would diminish unless I got very close), and 50mm too tight to reveal the important compositional markers hidden about the room and the subjects.

The Settings

As per my usual shot discipline, I am at base ISO here, in order to maximise quality. Importantly, I knew I did not want to blow the window highlights, as this bright area would pull the eye away from our subjects. I used; ISO 64, 1/100 and an aperture of f/1.4. I exposed to the right of the histogram, without clipping anything to have the maximum processability of the resulting RAW file. I wanted to be at f/1.4 for two main reasons. This aperture on a fast 35mm prime at close range, nicely isolates subjects and gives a subtle fall off, which further directs the eye. The second reason is that the natural lens vignette is a useful tool; it is most present at f/1.4 (I have slightly enhanced it in processing). By shooting wide open, the vignette helps me calm down the window area within the histogram boundaries, and keep the shadows in a better place. If I shot at f/4, there would have been zero vignette, and I would have had to back off the histogram more to the left side, meaning noisier shadows, and worse quality overall. The shutter speed of 1/100 is sufficient at this distance to freeze a slow moving subject such as the dog, however allows the tiniest hint of motion at the leading paw which I like (I could have gotten more of this by stopping the aperture down a shade, but it is at the risk of the dog becoming overall, too motion blurred and ruining the shot).

The Processing

Good processing should be unseen for the most part; in the sense that it is subtle and the edits cannot be physically noticed. The processing should bolster the story of the scene and further direct the eye. Everyone has their edit style, and most people have a constantly evolving style that only gets better through experience. I know mine has improved vastly, even just these last few years.

The next time you are shooting anything, just think where the scene elements will be the most impactful. Balance everything up, work with the light and process in order to further direct the eye and the story you are trying to tell.